Although the fire’s northern
trajectory was bad from an ecological standpoint, this was actually good from a
social perspective because if it had gone southward, it may have ended up
damaging more highly populated areas like Glendale and Burbank. The fire may
have also had a smaller burn area if it had spread to the south since there is
less flammable vegetation in such urban areas than in the forest.
My thematic map shows the extent of the fire damage as well
as group campsites in and around the burn area. The area closed for recovery
due to fire damage is, unsurprisingly, identical to the widest perimeter of the
area highlighted in my reference map as being on fire at some point in time (“Angeles
National Forest Station Fire Recovery Area”). I chose to show the
damaged area as a progression instead of just showing the total damaged area in
one layer in order to emphasize which areas were on fire the longest and, thus,
the most thoroughly damaged.
I chose campsite damage as my theme
was because I was camping in the Angeles National Forest at the Table Mountain
Campsite the weekend before we were given this lab assignment. As I was trying
to reserve a group campsite for my friends and I, I noticed that some of the
sites were still closed due to fire damage. Thus, I decided to map out how the
fire burn area compared to the location of group campsites. I also indicated
which campsites were still damaged at this point in time by marking those sites
with a red point instead of a black point.
I chose to map group sites instead
of all possible camping locations because there are over 53 camping areas in
the Angeles National Forest, only 10 of which are group campsites. The other
smaller sites tend to be small spaces along multi-day hiking trails, which can
only accommodate as few as 4 people. In contrast, group campsites can accommodate
50-250 people. Thus, the loss of a group campsite would be more devastating
from a recreation standpoint because they can accommodate a larger number of
individuals, because much more effort goes into creating and establishing them,
and because there are fewer of them in the forest.
After mapping out these
campgrounds, I was surprised to find that only four group sites were even near
the Station Fire. Some of the other sites such as the Chrystal Lake Group
Campground were damaged by other fires, but most of the group campgrounds were
spared or able to be easily restored. While the fire was still raging, it was
reported that “The burn area includes 13 campgrounds and 11 picnic
areas” (Behrens), but many of those grounds were small and easily restorable
sites. Of the group campgrounds in or near the burn area, only Lighting
Point is still closed due to damage from the Station Fire. Nonetheless this is
a substantial loss because Lightning Point was one of the most popular
campgrounds in the Angeles National Forest and it could accommodate up to 240
individuals.
I was originally surprised by how relatively
light the damage to group campgrounds in the forest were. However, perhaps the
group campsites were less likely to burn because they are surrounded by less
dense of vegetation than smaller campsites (due to space cleared for parking,
restrooms, tents, etc). This would make them less likely to burn as severely as
smaller campgrounds and picnic areas. Furthermore, since more tax money is
invested in group campgrounds (to build and maintain restrooms, the camp sites,
the ranger’s cabin, etc), they were a higher priority for the fire department
to protect.
Bibliography
"Angeles
National Forest Campgrounds." USDA Forest Service. United States
Government, n.d. Web. 11 June 2012. <http://www.r5.fs.fed.us/angeles/recreation/>.
"Angeles
National Forest Campgrounds Guide." US National Forest Campground
Guide. Moon Canyon Publishing, n.d. Web. 11 June 2012.
"Angeles
National Forest Station Fire Recovery Area." US Forest Service. US
Department of Agriculture, 1 July 2011. Web. 11 June 2012.
<http://www.fs.usda.gov/>.
"Angeles
National Forest, CA." Recreation.gov. United States Government, n.d.
Web. 11 June 2012. <http://www.recreation.gov/>.
Behrens,
Zach. "Station Fire Status: 87% Contained, What Trails/Campgrounds Were
Spared." LAist. N.p., 14 Sept. 2009. Web. 11 June 2012.
<http://laist.com/>.
US
Forest Service. US Department of Agriculture. Station Fire Restoration Fact
Sheet. N.p., 15 Apr. 2011. Web. 11 June 2012.
<http://www.fs.usda.gov/>.


No comments:
Post a Comment